Legal requirements for this differ according to the country and jurisdiction, and whether the university is private or public. Universities should all have misconduct procedures that provide due process to the person accused of wrong-doing. Read all the relevant university policies relating to the process you are involved in, and identify the requirement to provide you with the allegation made against you, and the relevant points where you are given the opportunity to respond to allegations. It is advantageous for you to be as familiar with these rules as you can be, so that you know your rights and obligations under those rules.
When you have been accused of misconduct, you need to read the university rules for the type of misconduct you are accused of, and the procedures for dealing with this. Rule 2 - Read the rules, understand them, and follow the process Any misconduct process that comports with the requirements of due-process will provide you with a written statement of the allegation against you, and show you the evidence that supports that allegation. There is no sense in speculating on what it is that you are alleged to have done, or what the evidence of the allegation might be, prior to being given this information in the formal process. (Collecting this evidence may be an ongoing process, so it might not all be present at the start of the allegation anyway.) At the start of the process, you are under no obligation to prove anything. They are also required to give you written details of the complaint against you, specifying exactly what it is you are alleged to have done, and they must also tell you the evidence against you. Public universities are subject to due process requirements for allegations of wrong-doing, and so they are required to operate under the principle that you are "innocent until proven guilty". The first thing to do if you are accused of wrong-doing is to remain calm and remind yourself that there is a process for dealing with misconduct allegations. Notwithstanding this limited information, questioners often wish to take immediate action to "prove their innocence" in relation to what they speculate to be the details of the allegation or the evidence relating to the matter.Īll of that is the wrong thing to do. Often the questions are posted when an accusation is first made, and often the questioner is not even familiar with the specific details of the allegation. Many questions on Academia.SE concerning accusations of misconduct are written in a tone of panic, asking how the questioner should "prove their innocence" at the outset of an accusation. Rule 1 - Stay calm and don't pre-empt the process Consequently, the following are some general rules you should follow to deal with the matter.
Universities have procedures in place that create an orderly process for determining the nature of the allegation, obtaining relevant evidence, hearing the matter and making a determination. For simplicity, most of my answer will assume that we are talking about a public university in a Western country (e.g., the US, England, Australia, etc.). I will assume here that the allegation is sufficiently serious that a reasonable degree of formalism and caution is appropriate. For minor matters this advice can be streamlined and the process is less formal, so you should adapt as required depending on the severity of the matter. This advice is general enough to encompass most allegations, including academic wrong-doing that does not rise to the level of formal "academic misconduct", but also including academic misconduct or sexual misconduct. The following is general advice for what to do when you are the subject of an allegation of wrong-doing at university.
0 kommentar(er)
